
Oil & Natural Gas Projects
Exploration and Production Technologies
Use of Cutting-Edge Horizontal and Underbalanced Drilling Technologies and
Subsurface Seismic Techniques to Explore, Drill, and Produce Reservoired Oil
and Gas from the Fractured Monterey Below 10,000 Feet in the Santa Maria Basin
of California
DE-FC26-03NT15426
Project Goal
The project goal was to demonstrate the feasibility of horizontal and underbalanced
drilling to penetrate and produce the deep fractured Monterey formation that
historically has been so productive of oil and gas in the shallower old oilfields
of the Santa Maria Basin of California.
Performer
Temblor Petroleum Company LLC
Bakersfield, CA
Project Results
The project demonstrated the feasibility of horizontal drilling in the deep
Monterey and the use of underbalanced drilling for greater penetration rates
and immediate evaluation of the reservoir being penetrated.
Benefits
This project demonstrates that horizontal and underbalanced drilling techniques
can be used in the Monterey reservoir. It already has spurred other operators
to undertake similar attempts in other wells in the area. Benefits to the state
and general public in terms of increased oil production have not yet been realized
but are expected to prove forthcoming as further work is done.
Background
The potential productive area is defined by seismic data that show a structural
closure covering some 1,600 acres in the deep Monterey formation. Two previous
wells on the structure, one drilled by Occidental Petroleum Corp. in 1985, and
a second drilled by Temblor Petroleum in 1999, encountered 32 gravity oil and
natural gas in the fractured Monterey reservoir with no evidence of water. A
700-foot thick oil column was indicated with a potential reserve of 30-50 million
barrels. The wells were drilled vertically with heavy mud, and casing was run
and cemented. Attempts to acidize the wells were unsuccessful due to a very
tight reservoir formation, although fracturing was indicated.
Based on outcrop observation supported by some core data, it could be demonstrated
that almost all the fracturing in the Monterey is vertical and is believed to
lie in a northeast-southwest direction. It was thought that a horizontal well
drilled in a northwesterly direction would best be able to encounter this vertical
fracturing. It was also believed that underbalanced drilling would prevent the
plugging of fractures by heavy mud and cement by allowing the oil and gas to
flow freely to the surface.
Project Summary
The well was drilled through the thick Sisquoc formation to 10,216 feet, where
7-inch casing was set in what was thought to be the top of the highly resistive
portion of the Monterey formation. This view was based on seismic data and opinions
of the mud loggers and supported by the occurrence of a large show of oil and
gas from a fracture at 10,236 feet. The casing was set at 60 degrees in the
horizontal curve. After setting casing, a 6 1/8-inch hole was drilled rapidly
at first, then with decreasing rate of penetration until a total measured depth
of 12,789 feet was reached. At this point the well had a true vertical depth
of 10,510 feet, a deviation of 88.82 degrees, and a horizontal displacement
of 2,959 feet.
The well was drilled underbalanced by employing water as a drilling fluid with
air injected at 3000 feet to ensure an underbalance of 300-400 psi while drilling.
Shows of oil and gas were strong at first, with gas up to 1,500 units with C1
to C5 oil vapors and live oil in the mud. Intensity of the shows varied with
the surging of the air injected. Very definite fracturing, with attendant strong
gas increases and as much as 20% oil in the drilling fluid, was encountered
in the last 1,000 feet of hole. However, the oil and gas entry was never strong
enough to produce oil and gas separately from the fluid separation system. No
evidence of formation water was encountered.
The project was successful in showing the ability to drill horizontally and
underbalanced in the Monterey formation with attendant increase in penetration
rates. However, in retrospect, because of the high drilling speeds in the first
part of the horizontal hole, it is very doubtful that the high-resistivity Monterey
was penetrated until after 11,200 feet measured depth. Above that point, it
is believed that the well was drilling in the softer Upper Monterey and not
in the high-resistivity Monterey. In the last part of the hole, when the high-resistivity
Monterey was definitely penetrated, drilling speeds were greatly reduced, bit
wear was severe, and insert bits rather than PDC bits had to be used. For this
reason, it is difficult to evaluate the efficacy of the drilling methods, had
the high-resistivity Monterey been encountered all the way in the horizontal
hole.
Current Status (June 2006)
The well was drilled in late 2004, and an open hole completion was attempted. The project performer plans to clean out and run a Schlumberger FMI Log and induction array log on tubing in the horizontal part of the well. Also, a surfactant will be induced in the most promising fractures of the horizontal section to remove any emulsion that may have formed. Further, acid will be applied to a fracture that had a strong oil and gas show while drilling with near 12 lb mud immediately below the shoe of the 7” casing to remove mud and cement that may be blocking the fracture. This work will be done later this month.
Project Start: September 30, 2003
Project End: June 30, 2006
Anticipated DOE Contribution: $1,527,388
Performer Contribution: $2,588,963 (63% of total)
Contact Information
NETL - Virginia Weyland (virginia.weyland@netl.doe.gov or 918-699-2041)
Temblor - George Witter (temblorllc@cs.com or 661-395-5730)
Publications
A Technical Progress Report was filed with the Department of Energy in February
2005. An article emphasizing the drilling techniques and innovations applied
on the well was published in the May, 2005 edition of World Oil under the heading
MPD well taps light oil in deep Monterey Shale, by Bob Knoll, Maurer Technology,
Inc.

New interpretation.

Old interpretation.
|