Return to NETL Home
 
Go to US DOE
 

Clean Coal Power Initiative
Round 1 Proposers

The opening round of the Department of Energy's Clean Coal Power Initiative solicitation has resulted in 36 private sector proposers submitting candidate projects valued at more than $5 billion with more than $1 billion in federal cost sharing requested from DOE. These descriptions (in the form of project abstracts) were provided by the applicants and are not intended to reflect the opinions or endorsements of the Department of Energy.

PROPOSER
[Click on name for details]
PROJECT TITLE
PROPOSED FINANCING
[In Millions]
DOE
Other
Total

PROPOSED
PROJECT
SITE

ADA Environmental Solutions, LLC,
Littleton, CO

Demonstrating the Multi3 Multi Pollution Control System

76.1

76.1

152.2

Salem, MA

Alaska Industrial Development & Export Authority, Anchorage, AK

Slagging Combustor Testing and Commercialization

35.7

55.2

90.9

Healy, AK

AmerenUE,
St. Louis, MO

Electro-Catalytic Oxidation Emissions Control Technology

73.0

73.0

146.0

West Alton, MO

Clean Energy Systems, Inc., Sacramento, CA

A 20-Megawatt Zero Emission Coal-Fired Demonstration Plant

54.9

54.9

109.8

TBD -
Multiple
candidate sites

Colorado Springs Utilities,
Colorado Springs, CO

Next-Generation Circulating Fluidized Bed Coal Generating Unit

30.0

271.5

301.5

Fountain, CO

Emery Energy Co.,
Salt Lake City, UT

Emery Gasifier for Clean Coal Power Applications

66.0

66.0

132.0

TBD

EnviRes, LLC,
Lexington, KY

Clean Coal Power Initiative (Gasification/ Combined Cycle Plant)

31.6

41.2

72.8

East St. Louis, IL

EnviroScrub Technologies Corp.,
Minneapolis, MN

EnviroScrub One Step SOx/NOx Reduction Technology

12.5

12.5

25.0

Cohasset, MN

FuelCell Energy Inc., Danbury, CT

High-Efficiency Clean Coal Fuel Cell/Turbine Power Plant Demo.

16.0

16.0

32.0

Danbury/Torrington, CT
& Wilsonville, AL

Great River Energy, Underwood, ND

Lignite Fuel Enhancement Commercial Application

11.0

11.0

22.0

Underwood, ND

Green Coal LLC, Nashville, TN

Green Coal Treatment Plant

3.8

3.8

7.6

Pearl, IL

Green Earth Industries, LLC, Dulles, VA

Effect of Amino Acids on Coal Bed Methane Production

0.3

0.3

0.6

Dulles, VA

Green Earth Industries, LLC, Dulles, VA

Effect of Amino Acids on Coal Purifying Bacteria

0.5

0.5

1.0

TBD

Harrison R. Cooper Systems, Inc.,
Bountiful, UT

Improved Boiler Performance Through On-Line Coal Analysis

0.2

0.2

0.4

Colorado Springs, CO Fairbanks, AK

Indianapolis Power & Light Co., Indianapolis, IN

The Clean Combustion System™ Demonstration

13.2

14.4

27.6

Indianapolis, IN

Kentucky Mountain Power, Lexington, KY

Baseload Coal and Gob Fired Electric Generating Facility

60.0

676.0

736.0

Kentucky

LG&E Energy Corp., Louisville, KY

Demonstration of the Airborne Process (Multi-Pollutant Control)

31.1

89.0

120.1

Carrollton, KY

McDermott Technology Inc., Alliance, OH

Cliffside Optimal Multi-Pollutant Abatement System

74.3

74.3

148.6

Cliffside, NC

NeuCo, Inc.,
Boston, MA

Integrated Optimization Software at the Baldwin Energy Complex

8.4

10.2

18.6

Baldwin, IL

Nissho Iwai American Corp., New York, NY

Upgraded Brown Coal Beneficiation Process

28.4

28.4

56.8

Wright, WY

Nordic Energy of Ashtabula, LLC,
Ann Arbor, MI

Ashtabula Advanced Gasification Coproduction Facility

150.0

1080.0

1230.0

Ashtabula, OH

N-Viro International Corp., Toledo, OH

Environmental & Economic Evaluation of a Biofuel Coal Additive

0.5

0.5

1.0

North Bend, OH
East Lansing, MI

Ohio University,
Athens, OH

Advanced Coal Gasification Combined Heat & Power Facility

67.0

67.0

134.0

Athens, OH

Phoenix Materials Co., Grand Rapids, MI

Phoenix Materials Co. Concrete Production (using fly ash)

5.2

5.8

11.0

West Olive, MI

Robinson Run Power LLC, Needham, MA

Dry Absorption Process (Emission Control)

12.0

12.3

24.3

Monongalia County, WV

Silverado Green Fuel, Inc., Fairbanks, AK

Clean Coal Power Generation w/Low-Rank Coal-Water Fuel

9.7

14.3

24.0

Fairbanks North Star
Borough, AK

Southern Company Services, Birmingham, AL

300-MW Demonstration of Coal Gasification Power Generation

250.0

469.5

719.5

TBD
Multiple
candidate sites

Stolar Research Corp., Raton, NM

Demonstration of Upstream Clean Coal Technology

1.0

1.4

2.4

TBD

SRT Group, Inc.,
Miami, FL

SRT/ISPRA Flue Gas Desulphurization Process

3.7

3.7

7.4

Farmington, NM

Tampa Electric Company,
Tampa, FL

NOx Removal and Reduction Project for Coal-Fired Power Plants

38.0

56.9

94.9

Apollo Beach, FL

Universal Aggregates, LLC, Bridgeville, PA

Demonstration of the Manufactured Aggregates Technology

10.3

15.4

25.7

Lakeland, FL

University of Kentucky Research Foundation, Lexington, KY

Advanced Multi-Product Coal Utilization ByProduct Processing

4.4

4.5

8.9

Ghent, KY

Western Greenbrier
Co-Generation LLC
, Lewisburg, WV

Clean Coal Co-Production Power Plant

107.5

107.5

215.0

Rainelle, WV

Wisconsin Electric Power Co.,
Milwaukee, WI

TOXECON Retrofit for Mercury and Multi-Pollutant Control

24.8

24.8

49.6

Marquette, MI

WMPI PTY., LLC, Gilberton, PA

Gilberton Coal-to-Clean Fuels and Power Co-Production Project

100.0

512.0

612.0

Gilberton, PA

Xiong Cheng-Rui

An Igniting and Self-Stabilized Pulverized
Coal Burner

0.2

--

0.2

TBD

   
1,411.3
3,950.1
5,361.4
 
 

TBD - To Be Determined